The United States exists in two forms: the original united States which controlled the federal government until 1860; and the federal United States which was incorporated in 1871.

The government of the original united States of America was usurped by the government of the federal United States which only controls the District of Columbia and its territories (Washington D.C.) as a for-profit corporation that acts as our National Government. The Corporate United States operates under public commercial law rather than private common law.

The original Constitution and the Declaration of Independence referred to “these united States.” The word “united” is an adjective describing the noun, “States.” Therefore the lowercase “united.”

When the federal United States was formed in 1871 the adjective “united” was changed to the noun “United” because the federal United States is a corporation which word is not an adjective but a noun.

The Constitution of the original united States of America was never removed; it has lain dormant since 1871 and is still intact to this day. This point was made clear by the Supreme Court justice Marshall Harlan in Downs v. Bidwell 182, U.S.. 244 1901 by the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that Instrument.

The rewritten 1871 Constitution of the United States (Inc.) overrides the original Constitution for the united States of America, which explains why the Congressman and Senators don’t abide by it and the President (CEO) of the Corporate United States can write Executive Orders to do whatever he wants to do. He is following corporate laws that completely strip sovereigns of their God-given unalienable rights.

Corporate public commercial law is not sovereign (private), for it is a public agreement between two or more parties under public contract.

COMMON LAW (under which sovereigns operate) is not commercial law, common law is personal and private.

COMMON LAW. As distinguished from the Roman law, the modern civil law, the canon law, and other systems, the common law is that body of law and juristic theory which was originated, developed and formulated and is administered in England, and has ordained among most of the states and peoples of Anglo-Saxon stock. Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255, 10 P. 674.

COMMON LAW "As distinguished from law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common-law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons, and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of Memorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing affirming and enforcing such usages and customs; and in this sense, particularly ancient unwritten law of England." 1 Kent, Comm. 492. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Call Pub. Co., 21 S.Ct. 561, 881 US 92, L.Ed 765; Barry v. Port Jervis, 72 N.Y.S. 104, 64 App. Div. 268; US v. Miller: D.C. Wash. 236 F. 798, 800. Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition p. 345-246

To an American familiar with the terminology and process of our legal system, which is based on English common law, civil law systems can be unfamiliar and confusing. Even though England had many profound cultural ties to the rest of Europe in the Middle Ages, its legal tradition developed differently from that of the continent for a number of historical reasons, and one of the most fundamental ways in which they diverged was in the establishment of judicial decisions as the basis of common law and legislative decisions as the basis of civil law. Before looking at the history, let’s examine briefly what this means.

COMMON LAW is generally uncodified. This means that there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. While common law does rely on some scattered statutes, which are legislative decisions, it is largely based on precedent, meaning the judicial decisions that have already been made in similar cases. These precedents are maintained over time through the records of the courts as well as historically documented in collections of case law known as yearbooks and reports. The precedents to be applied in the decision of each new case are determined by the pre- siding judge. As a result, judges have an enormous role in shaping American and British law. Common law functions as an adversarial system, a contest between two opposing parties before a judge who moderates. A jury of ordinary people without legal training decides on the facts of the case. The judge then determines the appropriate sentence based on the jury’s verdict. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition (with pronunciations)

Government De facto, a government of fact exercising power and control in the place of true and lawful government, a government not established according to the Constitution of the nation, not lawfully entitled to recognition on supremacy but which has nevertheless supplanted or displaced the government did you are. A government deemed unlawful or wrongful and unjust, which nevertheless, receives habitual obedience from the bulk of the commune (community).

There are several degrees of what is called “de facto government.” Such a government in its highest degree assumes a character closely resembling that of a lawful government. This is when the usurping government expels the regular authorities from their customary seats and functions and establishes itself in their place and becomes the actual government of a country.

The distinguishing characteristic of such a government is that it’s adherents,99 who are warring against the government de jour, do not incur the penalties of treason; and under certain limitations the obligations assumed by them in behalf of the country, or otherwise will generally be respected by the du jour government when restored. Such a government might more aptly be denominated “government of paramount force” maintained by the military power against the rightful authority of an established and lawful government, and obeyed in civil matters by private citizens.

99 someone who supports a particular party, person, or set of ideas.

They are usually administered by military authority, but they may also be administered by civil authority supported more or less by military force. See Thorington v. Smith 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 1, 19 L.Ed. 361.

De facto Government-A government that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the legal government, and is successful at least temporarily in overturning the institutions of the rightful government by setting up its own government in lieu thereof Wortham v. Walker 123 Tex. 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1145.

Government Du jour. A government of right, a true and lawful government, a government established according to the Constitution of the nation or state that lawfully entitled to recognition and the administration of the nation although actually cut off from power or control. A government deemed lawful, rightful and just, which has been nevertheless supplanted or displaced, which reserves not habitual obedience from the bulk of the community.

De jure - A condition in which there has been total compliance with all the requirements of law; of right, legitimate; lawful; by right and just title. In this sense it is the contrary of de facto. It may also be contrasted with the degratia, in which case it means “as a matter of right,” as degratia a means “by grace or favor.” Again, it may be contrasted with the deadequitate, here meaning “by law,” as the latter means “by equity.

HOW THE CONSTITUTION WAS USURPED BY THE CORPORATION

The CORPORATE UNITED STATES is not obligated nor accountable to the People except to make a profit for its stockholders as a corporation. The corporate interest is not benefit the people but uses the people and their labor to make a profit for the corporation. This corporation works in concert with the corporate courts and banks serve the people’s wealth. The transfer of the constitutional authority of the money over the private foreign bank (the non-federal Federal Reserve) has devastated our lives. This crime of taking the money authority away from the People must be corrected and authority restored to the constitutional form of government so our country can become prosperous once again.

From the speech in Congress in Congressional Record of March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303, regarding The Bankruptcy of the United States by Speaker, Representative James Trafficant Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House. “It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933 48 Stat. 1 Public Law 89-719; declared by Pres. Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent.

"H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933-Joint Resolution To Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidenced that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only."

“The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers., via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States offices, officials, and departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under the Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and establish by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury is that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R.13,955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States.

“Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens of mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) “Hypothecated"100 all property within the Federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. Citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a “beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the Federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets, and labor of their “subjects.” The 14th Amendment U.S. Citizen to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States Corporation all of the credit (money substitute) it needed.

100Hypothecate means to pledge something as security for a loan, without the actual delivery of the item pledged.

“Like any debtor The Federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the Federal Reserve of United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their “economic slaves,” the U.S. Citizens, as collateral against the federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks for us, birth certificates and nonprofit organizations as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment the international bankers.

“Unwittingly, America returned to its pre-American Revolution feudal101 roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people have no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the People have one master or another.”

101In a feudal system, a peasant or worker known as a vassal received a piece of land in return for serving a lord or king, especially during times of war. Vassals were expected to perform various duties in exchange for their own fiefs, or areas of land.

Sitemap
Articles
Contact Us
About Us
Privacy Policy
Legal Disclaimer
http://noauthoritycourts.com